Title 21 Rewrite (main page)
Documents for Review
Adopted Chapters
Public Hearing Draft
Public Review Draft #2
Public Review Draft #1
Module 3
Module 2
Module 1
Assembly Title 21 Committee Documents for Chapters Subsequently Adopted
Chapter 6 Substitute Version
Chapter 5, Attachment A--Substitute version of Chapter 5--includes amendments agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Assembly Title 21 Committee, and the Planning Department
Chapter 5, Attachment B--Amendments agreed upon by the Assembly Title 21 Committee and the Planning Department
Chapter 5, Attachment C--Use Tables with amendments
Chapter 5, Attachment D--Amendments offered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Assembly Title 21 Committee, or the Planning Department, where there is disagreement
Chapter 5, Attachment E--Additional amendments for the August 19, 2008 meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission Documents for Chapters Subsequently Adopted
Substitute version of Chapter 4
Amendments recommended for Chapter 5 by PZC
Amendments recommended for Chapter 6 by PZC
Issue Response for Chapter 4 prepared for Planning and Zoning Commission
Issue Response for Chapter 5 prepared for Planning and Zoning Commission
Issue Response for Chapter 6 prepared for Planning and Zoning Commission
Issue Response for Chapter 12 prepared for Planning and Zoning Commission
Public Hearing Drafts of Chapters Subsequently Adopted
Chapter 21.04, Zoning Districts
Chapter 21.05, Use Regulations
Chapter 21.06, Dimensional Standards and Measurements
Chapter 21.04, Zoning Districts-tracked changes
Chapter 21.05, Use Regulations-tracked changes
Chapter 21.06, Dimensional Standards and Measurements-tracked changes
Chapter 21.12, Nonconformities-tracked changes
Review Assistance Documents
Comparison of Districts' Dimensional Standards for the Current and Proposed Codes
Real Estate Task Force
In October and November of 2004, the Mayor’s Real Estate Task Force, with assistance from the Planning Department, “tested” the proposed development standards in Module 3 in a three and a half day workshop. With the help of three consultants, they examined seven recent development projects, including single- and multi-family residential and commercial developments, to identify issues and to compare costs (in 2004 dollars) of building the projects under current code requirements and under the proposed standards. Each consultant wrote a report (posted here) of their findings. The Planning Department, having noticed a few statements that were based on misinterpretations of the proposed code or mistaken impressions garnered during the workshop, made a few clarifications in a memo (also posted). Chris Duerksen of Clarion Associates, one of the consultants hired to rewrite Title 21, also attended the “testing” workshop and submitted his comments and conclusions (also posted).
Report of Dick Farley
Report of Dale Porath, AIA
Report of Terry Schoenthal
Planning Department Memo
Report of Chris Duerksen
In January of 2005, the Real Estate Task Force released their
Report and Analysis of the Proposed Rewrite of Title 21.
Preparatory Documents
Some documents require Adobe Acrobat reader ver 5.0 or higher. They may take several minutes to open.